Moral Disagreement across Politics is Explained by Different Assumptions about who is Most Vulnerable to Harm


Preprint


Jake Womick, Daniella Goya-Tocchetto, Nicolas Restrepo Ochoa, Carlos Rebollar, Kyra Kapsaskis, Samuel Pratt, B. Keith Payne, Stephen Vaisey, Kurt Gray
2024


View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Womick, J., Goya-Tocchetto, D., Ochoa, N. R., Rebollar, C., Kapsaskis, K., Pratt, S., … Gray, K. (2024). Moral Disagreement across Politics is Explained by Different Assumptions about who is Most Vulnerable to Harm. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qsg7j


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Womick, Jake, Daniella Goya-Tocchetto, Nicolas Restrepo Ochoa, Carlos Rebollar, Kyra Kapsaskis, Samuel Pratt, B. Keith Payne, Stephen Vaisey, and Kurt Gray. “Moral Disagreement across Politics Is Explained by Different Assumptions about Who Is Most Vulnerable to Harm” (2024).


MLA   Click to copy
Womick, Jake, et al. Moral Disagreement across Politics Is Explained by Different Assumptions about Who Is Most Vulnerable to Harm. 2024, doi:10.31234/osf.io/qsg7j.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{jake2024a,
  title = {Moral Disagreement across Politics is Explained by Different Assumptions about who is Most Vulnerable to Harm},
  year = {2024},
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/qsg7j},
  author = {Womick, Jake and Goya-Tocchetto, Daniella and Ochoa, Nicolas Restrepo and Rebollar, Carlos and Kapsaskis, Kyra and Pratt, Samuel and Payne, B. Keith and Vaisey, Stephen and Gray, Kurt}
}


Tools
Translate to